Diagnostic pathways in acute appendicitis: Clinical score plus ultrasound outperform CT scan or upfront surgery, especially in doubtful cases.

BACKGROUND: Controversies remain on the diagnostic strategy in suspected AA, considering the different settings worldwide. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational international multicentric study including patients operated for suspected AA with a definitive histopathological analysis was conducted. Three groups were analyzed: (1) No radiology; (2) Ultrasound, and (3) Computed tomography. The aim was to analyze the performance of three diagnostic schemes. RESULTS: Three thousand and one hundred twenty three patients were enrolled; 899 in the no radiology group, 1490 in the US group, and 734 in the CT group. The sex ratio was in favor of males (p < 0.001). The mean age was lower in the no radiology group (24 years) compared to 28 and 38 years in US and CT-scan groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Overall, the negative appendectomy rate 3.8%: no radiology group (5.1%) versus US (2.9%) and CT-scan (4.1%) (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity analysis showed the best balance in clinical evaluation + score + US. These data reach the best results in those patients with an equivocal Alvarado score (4-6). Inverse probability weighting (IPW), showed as the use of ultrasound, is significantly associated with an increased probability of formulating the correct diagnosis (p 0.004). In the case of a CT scan, this association appears weaker (p 0.08). CONCLUSION: The association of clinical scores and ultrasound seems the best strategy to reach a correct preoperative diagnosis in patients with clinical suspicion of AA, even in those population subgroups where the clinical score may have an equivocal result. This strategy can be especially useful in low-resource settings worldwide. CT-scan association may improve the detection of patients who may potentially be submitted to conservative treatment.

Sarcina Ventriculi infection: a rare but fearsome event. A Systematic Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVES: This study is aimed to report a case of SV-related gastritis and the results of a systematic literature review of SV infections. METHODS: Following a case presentation, we systematically searched different databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, google scholar) for the items "sarcina," "ventriculi," "clostridium" with AND/OR. RESULTS: A total of 55 articles reporting 65 cases of Sarcina Ventriculi were found. Thus, 66 patients, including our case, were reviewed. The median age was 51 years (IQR: 0-87 years). Females accounted for 51% of cases. 68% of patients had one or more comorbidities. SV was isolated in the gastrointestinal tract (88%), respiratory (5%), urine (4%), and bloodstream (3%) systems. Upper endoscopy was performed in 52 patients (79%). Biopsies were obtained in all 52 cases and were normal in 23%. Surgery was warranted in 15 patients (23%), and specific antimicrobial therapy was delivered in 34 (52%) patients. Mortality was 14%. At follow-up, 88% of patients showed complete eradication of the SV infection. CONCLUSIONS: Upper gastrointestinal biopsy positive for SV should prompt an evaluation of the clinical conditions, considering the risk of gastric perforation is not negligible. Antibiotic therapy may eradicate the infection and prevent complications. Emergency surgery is required in case of source control.

SARS-CoV-2 Is Present in Peritoneal Fluid in COVID-19 Patients.

BACKGROUND: The excretion pathomechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 are actually unknown. No certain data exist about viral load in the different body compartments and fluids during the different disease phases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Specific real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction targeting 3 SARS-CoV-e genes were used to detect the presence of the virus. RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 was detected in peritoneal fluid at a higher concentration than in respiratory tract. CONCLUSION: Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in peritoneal fluid has never been reported. The present article represents the very first positive result describing the presence of the virus in peritoneal fluid during an emergency surgical procedure in a COVID-19 sick patient. This article thus represents a warning for increasing the level of awareness and protection for surgeon especially in emergency surgical setting.

Laparoscopic transcystic exploration for single-stage management of common duct stones and acute cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: Common bile duct (CBD) stones are found in 10% of patients who undergo elective laparoscopic surgery for gallstone disease and in 10-20% of patients who present with acute cholecystitis (AC). For the latter, the role of laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the common duct (LTCE) as part of a single-stage procedure is still unknown. METHODS: This study, based on a "laparoscopy first" policy, included 201 subjects with cholecystocholedocholithiasis: 104 underwent a scheduled laparoscopic surgery (group A), and 97 where admitted for AC and had urgent laparoscopy (group B). Group B patients were significantly older (68.4 vs. 62.1 years; P = 0.0045), had a higher proportion of women (56% vs. 41%; P = 0.0345), and included more patients in the ASA III-IV class (39% vs. 21%; P = 0.0006). LTCE was performed by using basket-wired catheters. CBD clearance, operating time, conversion rate, morbidity and mortality, postoperative hospital stay, readmission, and residual CBD stones were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Clearance of CBD was obtained in 84% of patients of group A and in 80% of patients of group B (P = not significant). Time spent in the operating room was longer for group B (175 vs. 141 min; P = 0.0003). There were no significant differences for postoperative hospital stay (group A 4.9 vs. group B 5.2 days), readmission rate (3.7% vs. 3.7%), and residual CBD stones (2.8% vs. 3.1%). Need to convert and morbidity occurred more frequently in group B (11.7% vs. 4.6% and 28.7% vs. 16.8%, respectively), but differences were not significant. In group A, one patient died from MOFS. CONCLUSIONS: LTCE has proved to be a simple technique with a high yield of CBD clearance in the acute setting. Courses are comparable to those observed for the same procedure in elective surgery despite the fact that patients with AC are more at risk for drawbacks.

[Simultaneous laparoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones associated with acute cholecystitis. Results of a prospective study]. / Trattamento laparoscopico simultaneo per coledocolitiasi associata a colecistite acuta. Risultati di uno studio prospettico.

Laparoscopy for the management of acute cholecystitis has gained wide acceptance. Although it is well known that acute cholecystitis may be complicated by common bile duct stones in up to 15% of cases, to date there are no published studies addressing the management of common bile duct stones detected during laparoscopy for acute cholecystitis. We postulated that, when found, common bile duct stones associated with acute cholecystitis could be effectively and safety managed during the same laparoscopic procedure. We report on a five-year prospective study (2001-2005) involving 313 unselected patients who presented with a clinical diagnosis of acute cholecystitis (confirmed by specimen examination) and without any contraindication to laparoscopy. At surgery, transcystic cholangiograms were obtained in 289 (92%); the other 24 were excluded from the study. With an established diagnosis of common bile duct stones, attempts were made to clear the common bile duct by transcystic basket retrieval, ERCP or choledochotomy. Prevalence of common bile duct stones in acute cholecystitis, success of laparoscopic common duct clearance, conversion rate, operative time, morbidity, and postoperative hospital stay were the main outcome measures. Common bile duct stones were found in 63 pts (21.7%) presenting with acute cholecystitis. At laparoscopy, 12 patients (19%) required conversion to open surgery, 3 of these being due to failure to achieve common bile duct clearance. Common bile duct stones were cleared entirely laparoscopically in 51 patients (81%) by means of transcystic stone retrieval (38 pts, 75%), ERCP (12 pts, 23%) or choledocotomy (1 pt, 2%). At intention to treat analysis, patients undergoing cholecystectomy plus common bile duct clearance compared to those undergoing cholecystectomy alone, spent significantly more time in the operating theatre (mean 192 min vs 118 min, p < 0.001), needed open conversion more frequently (19% vs 6.1%, p = 0.0045), and had a higher overall morbidity rate (17.4% vs 4.4%, p = 0.015). The simultaneous procedure also adversely affected the postoperative hospital stay (mean 4.8 vs 3.4 days, p = 0.0164). Mortality was nil in both groups. The prevalence of common bile duct stones in patients presenting with acute cholecystitis should not be neglected. When common bile duct stones are found, clearance may be obtained laparoscopically in a substantial number of cases without any need for open surgery. The simultaneous laparoscopic approach for acute cholecystitis and common bile duct stones remains, however, a highly skilled and technically demanding procedure. Although a moderate incidence of drawbacks is observed, the results should be interpreted from the point of view of an all-in-one procedure that allows the patients to be cured without needing any further sequential interventions.